[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] FC6, xen 3.0.3, ia32, rpms from either FC6 repo or xensource, failing to start a vm
- To: "Steven Hand" <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:33:02 -0700
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:33:42 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R8Ozi3gVekWiVLjd0zJOSlbkVRRp0u8Ocf8DF2fsJ7ehJECzYjVG579blXIBuU0NEyaEzu1p4BTBYbfvuLQEw77uqYbhbC/LeK1Rz4XucMY9XoFB6DORE+acPC6bxwTH0YdgCo2PbIrmNgLRtUe36ZGddv78O6DUhmzKLa/rzBA=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
yeah, I found it by tracing xend; it looks like the RPMs at xensource
and in FC6 are for PAE kernels, which plan 9 is not.
Guess I build from source now.
Thanks for the pointers, though.
ron
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
- Prev by Date:
Re: [Xen-devel] FC6, xen 3.0.3, ia32, rpms from either FC6 repo or xensource, failing to start a vm
- Next by Date:
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_DEV_MEM_MMAP_MEM fix
- Previous by thread:
Re: [Xen-devel] FC6, xen 3.0.3, ia32, rpms from either FC6 repo or xensource, failing to start a vm
- Next by thread:
Re: [Xen-devel] FC6, xen 3.0.3, ia32, rpms from either FC6 repo or xensource, failing to start a vm
- Index(es):
|
