[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Partial fix for compat build non-portability
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:21:05PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > We only care about it working for the x86/64 target since that's the only > one that asserts CONFIG_COMPAT. Why would wrapping structs individually be > better than wrapping whole header files? I've been building with the below, but haven't verified it's correct. regards john # HG changeset patch # User john.levon@xxxxxxx # Date 1168532284 28800 # Node ID 30f9b54e54d444fa1f897257b6a35d8caabc8b6e # Parent cf35b1e695d68c4503784506ee62ceffcff69452 Enforce pragma pack(4) for the compat headers. Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@xxxxxxx> diff --git a/xen/include/Makefile b/xen/include/Makefile --- a/xen/include/Makefile +++ b/xen/include/Makefile @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ cppflags-$(CONFIG_X86) += -m32 cppflags-$(CONFIG_X86) += -m32 # 8-byte types are 4-byte aligned on x86_32 ... -prefix-$(CONFIG_X86) := \#pragma pack(push, 4) -suffix-$(CONFIG_X86) := \#pragma pack(pop) +prefix-$(CONFIG_X86) := \#pragma pack(4) +suffix-$(CONFIG_X86) := \#pragma pack() endif diff --git a/xen/tools/compat-build-header.py b/xen/tools/compat-build-header.py --- a/xen/tools/compat-build-header.py +++ b/xen/tools/compat-build-header.py @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import re,sys import re,sys pats = [ - [ r"__InClUdE__", r"#include" ], + [ r"__InClUdE__(.*)", r"#include\1\n#pragma pack(4)" ], [ r"\"xen-compat.h\"", r"<public/xen-compat.h>" ], [ r"(struct|union|enum)\s+(xen_?)?(\w)", r"\1 compat_\3" ], [ r"@KeeP@", r"" ], _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |