[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Mkinitramfs wants minimum 2.6.19 kernel!


  • To: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Cédric Schieli" <cschieli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:51:16 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:50:41 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ostO57DtwCuYVNXS+zFhatvohx3w13VoUbyujdZcFkGIQ8MMGrA/Va8Ma7mHRJEyExiN5c//rc2tDXKewmT37Z4Udon10wEijlq40npO1ko3jQBPWB2GwKVd+zEEb/5n3pVg/iH5hb7vXKSPflydwNbxm3yCpTdxmbGSVNacKGg=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,


I've setup a repository dedicated to Xen 3.0.4 for Feisty.
It is located at http://cedric.gabriello.fr/ubuntu
Hypervisor and tools are 3.0.4 plus some pygrub and pvfb fixes backported from xen-unstable
Kernel is Chuck's 3.0.3 plus pvfb kernel parts backported from xen-unstable
I've built i386 packages only but they should build on amd64 without much trouble.


Cedric


2007/3/5, Emre Erenoglu <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Chuck,

First of all, thank you very much for your response. I just sent you a
personal email as I didn't recognize you sent a response here.

Chuck, I'm more looking into having 3.0.4 or a development version of
3.0.5 (as I do daily builds). I think at least having 3.0.4 is
necessary as it has a lot of fixes for HVM domains.

Is it possible to install 3.0.3 with 2.6.19 from the packagas, than
"upgrade" to 3.0.4 or latest daily build without touching the 2.6.19
kernel?

Please let me know if you'd need some help (testing, bug reporting,
porting to 2.6.20 etc.) with Xen on Ubuntu!

Thanks,

Emre


On 3/5/07, Chuck Short <zulcss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Feisty has support for 3.0.3.
>
> apt-get install ubuntu-xen{desktop,server}.
>
> chuck
>
> On 3/5/07, Jacob Gorm Hansen <jacobg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:23 +0100, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > > Dear Developers,
> >
> > > root@xen:/boot/xen# depmod 2.6.18-xen
> > > root@xen:/boot/xen# mkinitramfs -o /boot/xen/initrd-2.6.18-xen.img 2.6.18-xen
> > > W: udev hook script requires at least kernel version 2.6.19
> > > W: not generating requested initramfs for kernel 2.6.18-xen
> > >
> > > So mkinitramfs complains that my udev scripts need at least kernel
> > > 2.6.19. Would one of you have any clue on how to overcome this
> > > problem?
> >
> > Perhaps switch to a distro not written by thirteen-year olds... I am
> > pretty disgusted at the level of 'integration' between many modern
> > distros and the Linux kernel. It used to be you could just drop in
> > whatever kernel you liked, but these days your system may not even boot
> > if you don't have a bleeding-edge kernel.
> >
> > In other words, I would report this bug to Ubuntu or whoever wrote the
> > script.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jacob
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>


--
Emre Erenoglu
erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
emre.erenoglu@xxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.