Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 21/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Use the hvc console infrastructure for Xen console

[Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:31:49 +0000 Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 16/3/07 09:58, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> These mb()'s are pretty standard for lock-free producer/consumer
> >> rings. Write descriptor /then/ write the updated producer. Read the
> >> producer /then/ read any descriptors revealed by this new producer
> >> value.
> > 
> > then use rmb()/wmb(). Rarely does a ring protocol truly need mb().
> 
> It's needed for writing data /after/ reading the consumer index that shows
> you have space to write. Looking through xenbus_comms.c I think all the
> barriers are correct except there is a spurious extra mb() in xb_read(),
> where there is a later rmb() which is sufficient by itself. All the others
> have a purpose.
> 

If Ingo couldn't work this out from reading the code then nobody else can,
and we have a maintainability problem which can only be solved with
adequate commenting.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel