[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback


  • To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:18:54 +0000
  • Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:18:02 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acdq2Sl/aBo/StbMEduzOgAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback

On 20/3/07 10:11, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes that's a good idea and would avoid the grant table addition.
> 
> My only concern would be future acceptance into the mainstream
> Linux kernel, especially on the domU side since I'd like to see
> this idea used for dom0 => domU as well.
> 
> However, I'm certainly happy to explore doing it in the way you
> suggested.

That's quite a valid concern, but I think that the required addition to the
#PF handler (certainly for i386 and x86/64) will be clean and small, and it
will not affect #PF critical-path latencies. I'd be fairly optimistic about
it getting accepted upstream, perhaps modulo concerns over whether we'd need
to implement it for *every* architecture.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.