[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen unstable full validation results for cset: #16379


  • To: "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:36:25 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:37:10 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acgw23Y0Vm7IrFw+Tj+HiIcaJKZwVgAVzU/wAApSTtA=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen unstable full validation results for cset: #16379

>-----Original Message-----
Hi Ian,

Thanks for the reply. Please see my feedback. 
>
>> Issue list:
>> --------------------------------
>> 1. [TXT] In weybridge, tboot could not boot dom0 successfully
>
>I assume the usual Intel folks will look into this.

Yes. Intel developer are looking at the issue.

>
>> 2. [Stress] HVM RHEL5.1 guest crashed when running crashme.
>
>Is this the ioport emulation issue that was discussed on the 
>list today?
>

Dexuan sent out a patch to work around this issue: [PATCH][HVM] Inject
#GP for un-emulated instructions rather than crash guest

>> 3. [Guest Test] SMP VISTA HVM guest might be blue screen when doing
>> large I/O in dom0
>
>This is under investigation.

We found this issue on some 2 cores machines. When scp a large file (5G)
to Dom0, SMP VISTA HVM might blue screen. If using disk stress tool, the
problem would be more easy to see. The BSOD information is: "a clock
interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated
time interval" with Bug Check 0x101.

>
>> 4. [Device Model] HVM's ne2k NIC easily lose network.
>
>Please can you give more details. Is there any guest that actually
>requires ne2k anyhow?

Should be not. As ne2k is a optional config for HVM domain vif, so we
also tested it. But found ne2k is not easy to use like RTL 8139.
If so, we could remove the ne2k description in xmexmaple.hvm. :)

>
>> 5. [Device Model] vnif can not coexist with 8139 nic.
>> 6. [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest installation failure.
>
>HVM? Do you test the PV kernel as well?

Yes. It is HVM domain. We didn't try PV installation. The Qemu window
would disappear, when doing RPM installation. 
The special config is "vcpus=2 acpi=1 apic=1 pae=1 memory=1024
blank_disk=5G."

>
>> 7. [Installation] Fedora7 IA32 SMP guest installation failure.
>
>HVM? Do you test the PV kernel as well? Is the install crash 
>the same as
>FC8?

Yes. This is also HVM domain OS installation. It is not same with F8.
The installation kernel would hang. It is a SMP IA32 Fedora7.

Best Regards,
Yongkang You
 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.