[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Question about implementation of 32-bit guestson64-bit hypervisor (IDT-related)
On 8/12/07 05:54, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You should be able to find this in SDM Vol 3A: > 3.8.1 Enhanced Legacy PAE Paging > On Intel 64 processors, the page directory pointer entry supports > physical address size of the underlying implementation (reported by > CPUID.80000008H). Legacy PAE enabled paging [see Section 3.8.2, "Linear > Address Translation With PAE Enabled (4-KByte Pages)" and Section 3.8.3, > "Linear Address Translation With PAE Enabled (2-MByte Pages)"] can > address physical memory greater than 64-GByte if the implementation's > physical address size is greater than 36 bits. Ah, I missed the most obvious one! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |