[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo PerformanceCountersinHVM guest


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:44:04 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:44:41 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AchjI+HHfc9VGIfdRRmDHn+4WaYJVAAACPKw
  • Thread-topic: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo PerformanceCountersinHVM guest

Hi, Keir,

May I know what's your opinions about the patch now?

Best Regards
Haitao Shan

I will. This isn't for 3.2.0 though, so I may not look until after the
3.2.0 branch. 

 -- Keri

On 17/12/07 07:22, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



        Hi, Keir,
        ?
        I have baked an updated patch. In this patch, I changed some logic?to
shorten the lengthy part of core2_vpmu_do_wrmsr. And also, I did a
rebase, since there?is?one?new changeset recently which made changes to
xenoprofile.   

        Can you have a look?
         <<pmu.patch>>
        Best Regards
        Haitao Shan

        Shan, Haitao wrote:
        > Hi, Salvador,
        >
        > Do you mean the strange indentation around CTRL_WRITE? That is
        > because there are three hard TABs before CTRL_WRITE. I am not sure
        > whether I should fix the original code, so I just leave them there
        > untouched.
        >
        > Haitao Shan
        >
 wrote:
>       > From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       <mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  ]
>       > Sent: 2007年12月15日 3:05 > To: Shan, Haitao
>       > Cc: Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jiang, Yunhong
>       > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo
>       > PerformanceCounters inHVM guest
>       >
>       > "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>       >
>       > Hello Haitao,
>       >
>       > I've done a look on the patch and found two places with wrong
>       coding > style. Take a look bellow:
>       >
>       >> diff -r 8f0cbfc478d6 xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
>       >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c  Thu Dec 13 09:31:03
>       2007 >> +0000 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c    Fri Dec
>       14 >> 07:21:43 2007 +0800 @@ -126,6 +127,11 @@ static void
>       >>      ppro_start(struct op_msrs co CTRL_READ(low, high, msrs, 0);
>       >>      CTRL_SET_ACTIVE(low);
>       >>      CTRL_WRITE(low, high, msrs, 0);
>       >> +    /* Global Control MSR is enabled by default when system power
>       >> on. +     * However, this may not hold true when xenoprof starts
>       to >> run. +     */ +    if ( ppro_has_global_ctrl )
>       >> +        wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 1);
>       >>  }
>       >>
>       >>
>       >> @@ -135,6 +141,8 @@ static void ppro_stop(struct op_msrs con
>       >>      CTRL_READ(low, high, msrs, 0);
>       >>      CTRL_SET_INACTIVE(low);
>       >>      CTRL_WRITE(low, high, msrs, 0);
>       >> +    if ( ppro_has_global_ctrl )
>       >> +        wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
>       >>  }
>       >
>       > Cheers,
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
>       _______________________________________________
>       Xen-devel mailing list
>       Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.