[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo PerformanceCountersinHVM guest


  • To: "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:58:18 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:58:49 -0800
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AchjI+HHfc9VGIfdRRmDHn+4WaYJVAAACPKwAACncOM=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo PerformanceCountersinHVM guest

Good enough. I'll check it in.

 K.


On 30/1/08 09:44, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Keir,
> 
> May I know what's your opinions about the patch now?
> 
> Best Regards
> Haitao Shan
> 
> I will. This isn't for 3.2.0 though, so I may not look until after the
> 3.2.0 branch. 
> 
>  -- Keri
> 
> On 17/12/07 07:22, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Keir,
> ?
> I have baked an updated patch. In this patch, I changed some logic?to
> shorten the lengthy part of core2_vpmu_do_wrmsr. And also, I did a
> rebase, since there?is?one?new changeset recently which made changes to
> xenoprofile.   
> 
> Can you have a look?
> <<pmu.patch>>
> Best Regards
> Haitao Shan
> 
> Shan, Haitao wrote:
>> Hi, Salvador,
>> 
>> Do you mean the strange indentation around CTRL_WRITE? That is
>> because there are three hard TABs before CTRL_WRITE. I am not sure
>> whether I should fix the original code, so I just leave them there
>> untouched.
>> 
>> Haitao Shan
>> 
>  wrote:
>>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  ]
>>> Sent: 2007年12月15日 3:05 > To: Shan, Haitao
>>> Cc: Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jiang, Yunhong
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Enable Core 2 Duo
>>> PerformanceCounters inHVM guest
>>> 
>>> "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> 
>>> Hello Haitao,
>>> 
>>> I've done a look on the patch and found two places with wrong
>> coding > style. Take a look bellow:
>>> 
>>>> diff -r 8f0cbfc478d6 xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c  Thu Dec 13 09:31:03
>> 2007 >> +0000 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c    Fri Dec
>> 14 >> 07:21:43 2007 +0800 @@ -126,6 +127,11 @@ static void
>>>>      ppro_start(struct op_msrs co CTRL_READ(low, high, msrs, 0);
>>>>      CTRL_SET_ACTIVE(low);
>>>>      CTRL_WRITE(low, high, msrs, 0);
>>>> +    /* Global Control MSR is enabled by default when system power
>>>> on. +     * However, this may not hold true when xenoprof starts
>> to >> run. +     */ +    if ( ppro_has_global_ctrl )
>>>> +        wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 1);
>>>>  }
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> @@ -135,6 +141,8 @@ static void ppro_stop(struct op_msrs con
>>>>      CTRL_READ(low, high, msrs, 0);
>>>>      CTRL_SET_INACTIVE(low);
>>>>      CTRL_WRITE(low, high, msrs, 0);
>>>> +    if ( ppro_has_global_ctrl )
>>>> +        wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
>>>>  }
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.