[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Fix the bug of guest os installationfailure and win2k boot failure


  • To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:32:21 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:34:30 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AciIBgTbUv10I0dQRSWDUmWTZvY2cwAA2Hm8AABl+TAAA81x3gABF9GAAACYnvIAHcI14AAPIBRjAAE/9bAAAW0NBgANnAof
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Fix the bug of guest os installationfailure and win2k boot failure

On 18/3/08 10:02, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> In your last sentence, do you mean that we still
>> need to do an entire I/O permission check (including CPL, IOPL, and TSS I/O
>> bitmap) in x86_emulate() for safety consideration? Thanks! :-)
> 
> Yes. Like I said: the CPL-IOPL check is very cheap, the TSS bitmap check is a
> little more expensive but probably relatively rare. And in any case the I/O
> port access latency is largely dominated by the VMEXIT/VMENTRY times. Also the
> devices we emulate are mostly managed by mmio.

I'll cook up a patch for this myself, by the way.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.