[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: s_time going backwards on same processor?
In a quick glimpse, your measure_stime_skew has interrupt enabled absolutely at exit, instead of restoring previous setting. Would it be a trouble-maker? I have no latest code at hand, but at least for what I can check: in local_time_calibration: local_irq_disable(); curr_master_stime = read_platform_stime(); curr_local_stime = get_s_time(); rdtscll(curr_tsc); local_irq_enable(); with your patch, interrupt is enabled after get_s_time, which then may have curr_tsc read out from a different time point... Thanks, Kevin >From: Dan Magenheimer [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: 2008年7月26日 9:47 > >OK, I am definitely recording stime going backwards >observed with the attached patch. I have recorded dozens >over a few hours. It appears to have no >obvious pattern between reports, but one thing >is consistent: In all cases, t->tsc_scale.shift >is -1. I'll try to run some more tests over the >weekend (e.g. with different clocksources... this >is with clocksource=hpet), but thought I'd report >what I have seen. I'm running on a dual-core single >socket ("Conroe"). > >Dan > >P.S. If you try the patch, ensure you set >the boot parameter "measurestime". > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:06 AM >> To: dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail) >> Cc: Dave Winchell >> Subject: Re: s_time going backwards on same processor? >> >> >> On 22/7/08 22:58, "Dan Magenheimer" >> <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > I *do* know that get_s_time() on different processors >> > can have this behavior and I know it is possible for >> > hvm_get_guest_time() to go backwards (timer_mode=0), >> > but I thought s_time was monotonically non-decreasing >> > on any given processor and that read_platform_stime() >> > is also monotonically non-decreasing. >> > >> > Does dom0 maybe have direct hardware access to the hardware >> > platform timer that xen system time is dependent on? >> >> No matter what happens to the underlying platform timer, it should be >> impossible for Xen system time to go backwards on any given >> processor. The >> calibration function never sets the TSC and system timestamps >> for the next >> time record any earlier than current TSC value and current >> computed system >> time value. Hence it should be impossible for system time to >> be computed as >> earlier than that time record. >> >> -- Keir >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |