[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 19.11.08 17:09 >>>
>On 19/11/08 15:55, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Is fixing this actually any harder than just bumping NR_IRQS/NR_PIRQS in Xen
>>> and NR_PIRQS in Linux? Have IRQS and VECTORS got somehow accidentally tied
>>> together in Xen?
>> Unfortunately there was some mix-up. But I think I got this fixed (running
>> a NR_IRQS=1024 hypervisor at the moment). I'd prefer to submit these
>> patches only after your NR_PIRQS -> NR_IRQS change comes out of the
>> staging tree though, to make sure it applies (and works) correctly on top
>> of it.
>Okay, I manually synced the tree. I've been meaning to do so for a while.

Is there anything in particular that's broken (and thus preventing it to
progress automatically) that one should be aware of?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.