Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19/11/08 16:23, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> Unfortunately there was some mix-up. But I think I got this fixed (running
>>> a NR_IRQS=1024 hypervisor at the moment). I'd prefer to submit these
>>> patches only after your NR_PIRQS -> NR_IRQS change comes out of the
>>> staging tree though, to make sure it applies (and works) correctly on top
>>> of it.
>> 
>> Okay, I manually synced the tree. I've been meaning to do so for a while.
> 
> Is there anything in particular that's broken (and thus preventing it to
> progress automatically) that one should be aware of?

No, I think some part of the test infrastructure is down.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel