[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749

Li, Haicheng wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 13/12/2008 22:43, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I think you agree that we don't need to keep guest 'actual' EFER.NX
>>>> in sync with its 'shadow' EFER.NX?
>>> That should be okay. The fact we see the NX bit in the shadow page
>>> tables means at least the BSP enabled NX. And I don't expect other
>>> processors would do otherwise. In other words, such out-of-sync
>>> situations be transient anyway.
>> Attached is my proposed patch. Does it look okay to everyone?
>> Haicheng: could you test if it gets rid of the HVM Solaris crash?
>>  Thanks,
>>  Keir
> Yes, we will test your patch and keep you posted with result.
> -haicheng

Hi Keir,

We tested your patch, it does fix the bug of HVM Solaris crash, viz. SMP 64bit 
Solaris10u5 HVM can boot up successfully with your patch applied. Thanks.

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.