[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] qemu patch for GPLPV drivers

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:17:25 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:17:34 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: Aclh5qFjXttjFh/SRu2psKlJKCRCcwAXN5fwABIp33o=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] qemu patch for GPLPV drivers

On 20/12/2008 01:41, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> OT, I'm curious, why is Xen in hg but the qemu stuff in git?

Upstream qemu uses git, so it's easiest to do the same. We'll probably do
the same for our Linux tree when we move from 2.6.18 to upstream pv_ops.

Xen itself uses mercurial just because that's what we switched to when
bitkeeper went away.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- RE: [Xen-devel] qemu patch for GPLPV drivers
  - From: James Harper

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Multi-queue support for Netchannel2
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] qemu patch for GPLPV drivers
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] GPLPV drivers 0.9.12-pre9 upload
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.