Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29/01/2009 11:07, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Does this look acceptable?
> 
> Seems fine, which is to say I don't see much advantage but have no
> objection. :)  Please try to make it clear in the comments which fields
> belong to a page which _has_ a shadow and which to a page that _is_ a
> shadow.

I'd agree with Tim. I perhaps have a slight preference for keeping it all in
one struct (i.e., the new approach) but I'm happy either way.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel