[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: Grub2 on Xen PV
Ferenc Wagner wrote: > If it's new BSD (without the advertising clause), then that's > perfectly fine. Unfortunately I couldn't read so however hard I > tried. From the top level COPYING file: > > Licensing Exceptions (the relaxed BSD-style license) > ---------------------------------------------------- > > For the convenience of users and those who are porting OSes to run > as Xen guests, certain files in this repository are not subject to > the GPL when distributed separately or included in software > packages outside this repository. Instead we specify a much more > relaxed BSD-style license. Affected files include the Xen interface > headers (xen/include/public/COPYING), and various drivers, support > functions and header files within the Linux source trees on > http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.X-xen.hg. In all such cases, > license terms are stated at the top of the file or in a COPYING > file in the same directory. Note that _any_ file that is modified > and then distributed within a Linux kernel is still subject to the > GNU GPL. > > But there's no COPYING file under extras, nor the above mentions > MiniOS. The comment in blkfront.c says it's based on netfront.c, > whose comment says it's based on Xen Linux, which is BSD by the above, > so that may be OK. But other parts of MiniOS haven't got any license > declaration, so it isn't obvious, for the very least... I wonder how > it could be better communicated. > > Meanwhile I'll try to proceed nevertheless. Yeah, we'll try to make it more clear. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |