Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/05/2009 07:05, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> While I didn't try it, I'm convinced it would.
> 
> I tried it (gcc 4.1.2) and it didn't. And I'm not sure what the theoretical
> warning message would be: Throwing away a non-void value? We do that with
> return values from functions very often.
> 
> I'll change BUILD_BUG_ON() and avoid BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(), but revert to your
> approach if some gccs turn out to act differently.

Actually I suppose having ZERO in the name is nice in arithmetic
expressions. So I'll just check in as-is after all.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel