[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-users] Re: Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux
On 03/06/2009 12:15, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> It does not however preclude fixing the dom0 interface. >> >> It wasn't my intention to imply that. The interface can be extended >> when needed. PAT support will probably be such a case. Changing it in >> incompatible ways isn't going to work though. > > But that means that if there is some fundamentally broken piece of > dom0 design, that the Linux kernel will be stuck with it ***forever*** > and it will contaminate code paths and make the code harder to > maintain ***forever*** if we consent to the Xen merge? Is that really > what you are saying? Be careful how you answer that.... It's not true, if you are prepared for a new dom0 kernel to require a new version of Xen (which seems not unreasonable). We're happy to make reasonable interface changes, and deal with compatibility issues as necessary within Xen. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |