[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix s3 resume on AMD CPUs
>>> Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> 15.06.09 17:33 >>> >@@ -174,8 +177,11 @@ wakeup_64: > mov $(__HYPERVISOR_DS64), %eax > mov %eax, %ds > >- # long jump to return point, with cs reload >- rex64 ljmp *ret_point(%rip) >+ /* Continue with wakeup in the high-level wakeup code. >+ * Reload cs there. >+ */ >+ movq ret_point(%rip), %rbx >+ jmp *%rbx > > .align 8 > ret_point: Why do you add a comment ("Reload cs here") here that is not in sync with the changed code? Also, if the sole reference ro ret_point is now a near jump, why don't you remove the selector part of ret_point itself? Further more, why does this need to be an indirect jump now that it's not a far jump anymore? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |