Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:37:08AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> I've also built fresh 2.6.31 on F11. Behaviour 2.6.31 when loading under Xen 
> 3.4.1 on
> top of F11 seems to be the same.
> Presence 1024M <=dom0_mem<=4096M  ant xen-3.4.1.gz line is still required.
> If serial outputs are desired, i can get them.
>

Yes, please post 3 serial console logs:

1) Xen-3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (no dom0_mem set)
2) Xen 3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (dom0_mem=4096M)
3) 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 kernel on baremetal, no Xen

-- Pasi

> Boris.
> 
> --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 
> 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 
> 9.04 Server
> To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 2:56 AM
> 
> Are you expecting improvement after  09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ?
> 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don't look to me to have any.
> 
> Boris.
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel