RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jiang, Yunhong writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after 
xen_pause_requested"):
> For example, considering user do vcpu-set 2 (i.e set vcpu number to
> 2), vcpu-set 4, and vcpu-set 2, and guest didn't take any action at
> all, would it be really so important? Or, if it is 2->4->3, should
> the xm vcpu-set itself really need care 4 vcpu is bringup in some
> time?

This is a good point.  If you are sure that intermediate values are
not important, and that changes are idempotent, then the open loop
approach is quite fine.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel