Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 26] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:14 +0100, Gianni Tedesco (3P) wrote:
> So can you submit that in one chunk next time without the
> backup/restore features, diffs for comparison purposes? 

backup/restore features? What do you mean?

If you are referring to the separation of movement, reformatting and
finally autogeneration into separate patches then I think this is
necessary to be able to simply (practically automatically) validate the
series is correct. I'd rather not get rid of that since it makes
rebasing much simpler.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel