Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 26] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions

[Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:25 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:14 +0100, Gianni Tedesco (3P) wrote:
> > So can you submit that in one chunk next time without the
> > backup/restore features, diffs for comparison purposes? 
> 
> backup/restore features? What do you mean?

I meant the cp _libxl_types.h back and forth in makefiles

> If you are referring to the separation of movement, reformatting and
> finally autogeneration into separate patches then I think this is
> necessary to be able to simply (practically automatically) validate the
> series is correct. I'd rather not get rid of that since it makes
> rebasing much simpler.

OK fair enough, I am just a passive consumer who is always applying
whole series anyway.

As long as the bug-fixes you posted don't get lost in the wind until the
next time you re-submit I am happy.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel