[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Roger Cruz" <roger.cruz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:00:01 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:02:27 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: Act3NugDA7zoYYmISGqtqDnXk544Tg==
Thread-topic: IDT location safe if > 4GB?

Are there any known or potential problems with Xen’s xmallocing the secondary cores’ IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher than 4GB?

Thanks

Roger R. Cruz

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] refetch qemu if QEMU_TAG changed
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] conditional clearing of dom0_l2 in i386's zap_low_mappings() ?
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] refetch qemu if QEMU_TAG changed
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.