[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?


  • To: Roger Cruz <roger.cruz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:12:23 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:13:24 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hV1QYUMNeuwOToLMfIQ467wQmjifCM12g1Hb+fdYl3s99yizA8kmalk3lcoUKruIRA ZoAIwqw7PIiW9bQV9aXquMo5s9jOPulnSM2wJ0UZUT+M+qYMQmfzToa+9oRZz6qN9bKS 2ckwGmX/xHBL1q8OTWAZyuLDzV+8W387uOt9U=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Act3NugDA7zoYYmISGqtqDnXk544TgAAbn/J
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?

On 29/10/2010 08:00, "Roger Cruz" <roger.cruz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are there any known or potential problems with Xen¹s xmallocing the secondary
> cores¹ IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher than
> 4GB?

No.

 - Keir

> Thanks
> Roger R. Cruz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.