[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Roger Cruz" <roger.cruz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:14:34 -0500
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:15:22 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Act3NugDA7zoYYmISGqtqDnXk544TgAAbn/JAAAMcNA=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?

Thanks Keir. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 3:12 AM
To: Roger Cruz; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?

On 29/10/2010 08:00, "Roger Cruz" <roger.cruz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are there any known or potential problems with Xen¹s xmallocing the secondary
> cores¹ IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher than
> 4GB?

No.

 - Keir

> Thanks
> Roger R. Cruz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.864 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3222 - Release Date: 10/28/10 
14:34:00

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.