[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vtdt: Modify vlapic code to add vtdt support


  • To: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:56:49 +0000
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:59:37 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nq89pPKbShNnEsStoEKN0oW/taU+uQ2qJx5asWkY/ka244161WTZrlpzGKYkHqtyfE aJfriMaaGR4IqETuNcDVN0zSjDcj1Jf7I7txlBhAFR4phljJsZ5AzOvd/sSZquddj8MT RMpYUiGT6veFrtn+e2ulpR2Gwo2JMzc42T2WU=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcubPslPXD79XKNoRpanX8il5iAsXgAMXEvzAAAbfHAAASRLwA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vtdt: Modify vlapic code to add vtdt support

On 14/12/2010 09:30, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Writing any value to LVTT zaps TMICT,TMCCT,MSR_TDT? That seems pretty
>> unlikely to me! This obviously has effects on behaviour outside TDT
>> emulation as it affects TMICT/TMCCT emulation. Looks dangerous, as well as
>> wrong.
> 
> It should be better to do the zaps only while the mode bits of LVTT changes.

What is real hardware behaviour here? I don't see any zappings documented.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.