[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vtdt: Modify vlapic code to add vtdt support
On 14/12/2010 09:13, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Keir Fraser wrote on 2010-12-14: >>>>> @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct hvm_hw_lapic { >>>>> uint64_t apic_base_msr; >>>>> uint32_t disabled; /* VLAPIC_xx_DISABLED */ >>>>> uint32_t timer_divisor; >>>>> + uint64_t tdt_msr; >>>>> }; >>>> >>>> Is this backward compatible with old HVM save images? >>> >>> I am not sure about this. If it isn't, would you accept to simply >>> add another data trunk for TDT msr? >> >> That's Tim's call. I would personally prefer for Xen to accept >> truncated chunks, and extend them with sensible 'old save image' defaults, >> such as all-zeroes. >> That would be a generic solution to this case which will be reusable >> in future, and avoid needlessly creating extra chunk types just for >> backward compatibility reasons. > > Ok. Let's wait for Tim to answer the call. Well I propose the attached patch, and then you can use hvm_load_entry_zeroextend() in vlapic.c. I would split this patch into two pieces if I apply it (code movement first, then the zeroextend logic). It needs an Ack from Tim however. -- Keir > I just found some code in xen/hvm/save.h: _hvm_check_entry() > if ( type != d->typecode || len != d->length ) > { > gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, > "HVM restore mismatch: expected type %u length %u, " > "saw type %u length %u\n", type, len, d->typecode, > d->length); > return -1; > } > > So I am assuming it would not be backward compatible with old HVM save images. > > Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |