[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/9] mm: add apply_to_page_range_batch()
. snip.. > static int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, > unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - pte_fn_t fn, void *data) > + pte_batch_fn_t fn, void *data) > { > pte_t *pte; > int err; > - pgtable_t token; > spinlock_t *uninitialized_var(ptl); > > pte = (mm == &init_mm) ? > @@ -1940,25 +1939,17 @@ static int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, > pmd_t *pmd, > BUG_ON(pmd_huge(*pmd)); > > arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - > - token = pmd_pgtable(*pmd); > - > - do { > - err = fn(pte++, addr, data); > - if (err) > - break; > - } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); > - > + err = fn(pte, (end - addr) / PAGE_SIZE, addr, data); > arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); > > if (mm != &init_mm) > - pte_unmap_unlock(pte-1, ptl); > + pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); That looks like a bug fix as well? Did this hit us before the change or was it masked by the fact that the code never go to here? > return err; > } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |