Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] nestedsvm: ns_vmcb -> vvmcb

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 08:57:34 +0100

Cc:

Delivery-date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:59:06 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=XZ1GYmC6OCTw0JBZR+PwayQC4xJpFsbZZyJcdcUwf3MZFUiQYkS7vBjXvAn9SFvUKV F/lYbVmefBWvQwyibR7bYcLYg8HosT6996YwFIH/BuIvFR8QMvSfWF6DzRlyf0Pr20mh GwpyXK+sckzEEpbyjxMBez/W81gluZMPmejPg=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thread-index: AcwWw5O9VJueQkPrPkWDoYvNkmvyiQ==

Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] nestedsvm: ns_vmcb -> vvmcb

On 18/05/2011 10:39, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Rename the virtual vmcb from ns_vmcb to vvmcb to > make it easier for the reader what is meant. I don't think vvmcb is a good idea. It's too close to vmcb. I think the current name is actually okay, at least it is clearly distinct from anything else. And you use the ns_ prefix quite consistently everywhere -- just switching this one name would be weird. -- Keir > Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.