[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests
On 08/09/2011 11:12, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 08.09.11 at 11:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Keir, >> >> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should >> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI >> migrating line interrupts") in both trees. >> >> I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf() >> should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's >> already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output. > > Also shouldn't we have a backport of 23112:84e3706df07a ("Passthrough: > disable bus-mastering on any card that causes an IOMMU fault.") in the > 4.0 tree (even if it doesn't fully address the problem, yet - that's the > case in the other trees too)? Now done. -- Keir > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |