[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests

>>> On 08.09.11 at 12:48, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 08/09/11 11:17, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 10:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Keir,
>>> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
>>> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
>>> migrating line interrupts") in both trees.
>> It does fix a real bug. Perhaps Andrew could hack up a patch to make it
>> dependent on IO-APIC version?
> Now that I am not racing against a release deadline, this is a
> possibility.  It probably means falling through to the "fake an EOI for
> line level interrupt code", as the Status bit is RO in the IO-APIC (The
> IRR bit is RW but both need updating)
> Does anyone know which revision of the IO-APIC was the first with an EOI
> register?

As Keir said, code already exists which does this version check. But
to answer explicitly: It's version 0x20.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.