[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] interface: add 'discard-secure' and BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 23:12 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > # Date 1318457231 14400 > # Node ID 50850daec7f0486ee7ca69b3d4cb58b4d340a5a7 > # Parent 15c2d70dbac3e31c2d74b6700e1bb5f8a7d8256e > interface: add 'discard-secure' and BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE > > Alter the 'reserved' uint8_t to be used a 'flag'. We use only for > one flag: BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE. > > That flag can only be set if the backend has set 'discard-secure' to one. > If backend has not set 'discard-secure' to one, that flag will have no > effect. > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > diff -r 15c2d70dbac3 -r 50850daec7f0 xen/include/public/io/blkif.h > --- a/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h Wed Oct 12 18:07:07 2011 -0400 > +++ b/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h Wed Oct 12 18:07:11 2011 -0400 > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ > * e07154r6-Data_Set_Management_Proposal_for_ATA-ACS2.doc > * http://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/support/disc/manuals/ > * Interface%20manuals/100293068c.pdf > - * The backend can optionally provide two extra XenBus attributes to > + * The backend can optionally provide three extra XenBus attributes to these avoids patching (or more likely forgetting to patch) this line every time we add an attribute. > * further optimize the discard functionality: > * 'discard-aligment' - Devices that support discard functionality may > * internally allocate space in units that are bigger than the exported > @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ > * size. The discard-granularity parameter indicates the size of the internal > * allocation unit in bytes if reported by the device. Otherwise the > * discard-granularity will be set to match the device's physical block size. > + * 'discard-secure' - All copies of the discarded sectors (potentially > created > + * by garbage collection) must also be erased. To use this feature, the flag > + * BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE must be set in the blkif_request_trim. Stray "trim" here. > */ > #define BLKIF_OP_DISCARD 5 It just occurred to me that if reusing the reserved field is going to prove a problem we could have had BLKIF_OP_DISCARD_SECURE. I think we've got things under control though. > > @@ -159,7 +162,8 @@ typedef struct blkif_request blkif_reque > */ > struct blkif_request_discard { > uint8_t operation; /* BLKIF_OP_DISCARD */ > - uint8_t reserved; /* */ > + uint8_t flag; /* BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE or zero */ > +#define BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE (1<<0) /* ignored if discard-secure=0 */ > blkif_vdev_t handle; /* same as for read/write requests */ > uint64_t id; /* private guest value, echoed in resp */ > blkif_sector_t sector_number;/* start sector idx on disk */ > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |