[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Is: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: PTE updates in k(un)map_atomic need to be synchronous, regardless of lazy_mmu mode. Was: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Partially revert "remove lazy mode in interrupts"
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:55:14PM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >This patch fixes an outstanding issue that has been reported since > >2.6.37. Under a heavy loaded machine processing "fork()" calls could > >keepover with: > > I noticed this patch is not in Linux 3.1 -- was this fixed some > other way, or is it still in mainline's pipeline somewhere? Hmm, it was in Andrew's tree, but you are right - I am not seeing it in 3.1. Let me double check Andrew's tree. > > Thanks, > -Chris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |