[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Is: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: PTE updates in k(un)map_atomic need to be synchronous, regardless of lazy_mmu mode. Was: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Partially revert "remove lazy mode in interrupts"
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:55:14PM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >This patch fixes an outstanding issue that has been reported since > >2.6.37. Under a heavy loaded machine processing "fork()" calls could > >keepover with: > > I noticed this patch is not in Linux 3.1 -- was this fixed some > other way, or is it still in mainline's pipeline somewhere? Well, looks like it got dropped out of Andrew's tree. Not sure why, but let me make sure it gets the proper attention. Thanks for spotting it! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |