Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08 of 10] libxl: Implement libxl_sched_credit_param_[gs]et

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08 of 10] libxl: Implement 
libxl_sched_credit_param_[gs]et"):
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 17:51 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be "params" rather than "param" since it sets several
> > parameters ?
> 
> Hmm, I suppose so.  I think I accidentally said "param" because I
> originally wrote the patch series, the structure actually only contained
> one parameter.  Then I thought I might as well do both at the same time,
> but didn't have to re-write this patch. :-)

Well, a "params" struct containing only one param for this particular
scheduler is less weird than a "param" one containing several...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel