Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce libxl__device_generic_add_t

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce 
libxl__device_generic_add_t"):
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Can we avoid introducing more of these transaction loops using goto ?
> 
> I am afraid I actually prefer the simple goto scheme than the convoluted
> code below.

I really can't stomach any more of these gotos.  If you don't want to
abstract it away, can't you at least write the loop as a loop with
for() or while() ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel