Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce libxl__device_generic_add_t

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce 
> libxl__device_generic_add_t"):
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Can we avoid introducing more of these transaction loops using goto ?
> > 
> > I am afraid I actually prefer the simple goto scheme than the convoluted
> > code below.
> 
> I really can't stomach any more of these gotos.  If you don't want to
> abstract it away, can't you at least write the loop as a loop with
> for() or while() ?

Yes, I can do that.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel