Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.09.12 at 16:28, Ben Guthro <ben.guthro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How is it that it works with an older hypervisor, then?

Actually, checking again I see that I overlooked that specific
log entry (I expected them to be all close together, but they
aren't).

It is obvious that on the second restore the kernel passes
bad data to the hypervisor, but I can't tell yet whether that's
the kernel's fault - will need to look more closely.

Jan

> Konrad - is the v7 code functionally different than the v10 code, or
> is it more  stylistic changes?
> 
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 04.09.12 at 14:49, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I forgot to address your dom0 kernel concern -
>>>
>>> All of these tests have been run with Konrad Wilk's acpi-s3.vX branches.
>>>
>>> The later kernels took more recent branches, while the 3.2.yy kernels
>>> used an older (but still functional) branch (acpi-s3.v7)
>>
>> This and the log you provided suggest that your kernel is lacking
>> the MSI restore code altogether (or it is not getting called as
>> intended). With that, there's pretty little point in continuing
>> the investigation on the hypervisor side.
>>
>> Jan
>>




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel