[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Using debug-key 'o: Dump IOMMU p2m table, locks up machine
On 09/20/2012 01:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Ping? I've been meaning to work up a reply, but I haven't had time to swap in all the context again. J > >>>> On 04.09.12 at 11:26, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 04.09.12 at 10:13, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hmm don't know how to get the file/line, only thing i have found is: >>> >>> serveerstertje:/boot# gdb xen-syms-4.2.0-rc4-pre >>> GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.1-debian >>> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >>> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later >>> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> >>> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. >>> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" >>> and "show warranty" for details. >>> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". >>> For bug reporting instructions, please see: >>> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... >>> Reading symbols from /boot/xen-syms-4.2.0-rc4-pre...done. >>> (gdb) x/i 0xffff82c48015c9ee >>> 0xffff82c48015c9ee <context_switch+916>: mov %edx,%gs >>> (gdb) >> I'm not really a gdb expert, so I don't know off the top of my >> head either. I thought I said in a previous reply that people >> generally appear to use the addr2line utility for that purpose. >> >> But the disassembly already tells us where precisely the >> problem is: The selector value (0x0063) attempted to be put >> into %gs is apparently wrong in the context of the current >> GDT. Now, that's GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN on the Linux side, >> and ought to be valid. I'm surprised the guest (and the current >> process in it) survives this (as the failure here results in a failsafe >> callback into the guest). >> >> Looking at the Linux side of things, this has been that way >> forever, and I think has always been broken: On x86-64, it >> should also clear %gs here (since 32-bit processes use it for >> their TLS, and there's nothing wrong for a 64-bit process to put >> something in there either), albeit not via loadsegment(), but >> through xen_load_gs_index(). And I neither see why on 32-bit >> it only clears %gs - %fs can as much hold a selector that might >> get invalidated with the TLS descriptor updates. Eduardo, >> Jeremy, Konrad? >> >> Jan >> > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |