Re: [Xen-devel] Patches for v3.8

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 29.11.12 at 02:50, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:24:04 +0000
> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> >>> On 27.11.12 at 22:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >>> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Mukesh Rathor (6):
>> >       xen/pvh: Support ParaVirtualized Hardware extensions.
>> >       xen/pvh: Extend vcpu_guest_context, p2m, event, and XenBus.
>> >       xen/pvh: Implement MMU changes for PVH.
>> >       xen/pvh: bootup and setup (E820) related changes.
>> >       xen/pvh: balloon and grant changes.
>> >       xen/pvh: /dev/xen/privcmd changes.
>> 
>> As said before - I don't think it is a good idea to push the kernel
>> side changes into an official release when the hypervisor side ones
>> didn't even get an initial review yet.
> 
> On the xen patch side, I've refrshed my tree. I realized I had undone
> the union of pv_domain and hvm_domain since I used fields from both.
> I'm now redoing that to make that a union and add a struct in
> hvm_domain for fields from pv_domain that are used by PVH. 

Perhaps better to move out of the union just the shared fields?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel