Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] docs: check for documentation generation tools in docs/configure.

[Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/12/12 12:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> diff --git a/config/Docs.mk.in b/config/Docs.mk.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b6ab6fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/config/Docs.mk.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +# Prefix and install folder
> +prefix              := @prefix@
> +PREFIX              := $(prefix)
> +exec_prefix         := @exec_prefix@
> +libdir              := @libdir@
> +LIBDIR              := $(libdir)
> +
> +# Tools
> +PS2PDF              := @PS2PDF@
> +DVIPS               := @DVIPS@
> +LATEX               := @LATEX@
> +FIG2DEV             := @FIG2DEV@
> +LATEX2HTML          := @LATEX2HTML@

Didn't we drop all the Latex stuff from Docs? I've did a quick grep and
it seems it's still used by xen-api related docs... What I cannot find
is any user for LATEX2HTML, can't we remove than one?

> @@ -26,10 +26,12 @@ all: build
>
>  .PHONY: build
>  build: html txt man-pages figs
> -     @if which $(DOT) 1>/dev/null 2>/dev/null ; then              \
> -     $(MAKE) -C xen-api build ; else                              \
> -        echo "Graphviz (dot) not installed; skipping xen-api." ; fi
> +ifdef DOT
> +     $(MAKE) -C xen-api build
>       rm -f *.aux *.dvi *.bbl *.blg *.glo *.idx *.ilg *.log *.ind *.toc
> +else
> +     @echo "Graphviz (dot) not installed; skipping xen-api."
> +endif

Don't we need the latex stuff to build xen-api docs? For the xen-api
Makefile to succeed we seem to need PS2PDF, LATEX, DOT, DVIPS and NEATO.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel