Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15419: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.02.13 at 07:41, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 15419 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15419/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-win           7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  7 windows-install   fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-win          7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1  7 windows-install       fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win    7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3  7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1    7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 
> 15179

So this was due to 26503:69398345c10e conflicting with
26486:7648ef657fe7 and 26489:83a3fa9c8434 (the former was
put together much earlier than the other two, but had to be held
back until XSA-34 and XSA-35 went public, and I failed to notice
the conflict). I reverted it until I get a chance to clean this up
properly.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel