Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.02.13 at 11:36, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:12 +0000, xen.org wrote:
>> branch xen-unstable
>> xen branch xen-unstable
>> job test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu
>> test guest-localmigrate/x10
>> 
>> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
>> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
>> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
>> Tree: xen http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-unstable.hg 
>> 
>> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>> 
>>   Bug is in tree:  xen http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-unstable.hg 
>>   Bug introduced:  fd997a96d448
>>   Bug not present: ffd30e7388ad
>> 
>> 
>>   changeset:   26523:fd997a96d448
>>   tag:         tip
>>   user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>   date:        Fri Feb 08 11:06:04 2013 +0100
>>       
>>       x86: debugging code for testing 16Tb support on smaller memory systems
>>       
>>       Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>       Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This is now the second bisection to finger this changeset
> ("[xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2"
> yesterday was the other).
> 
> Perhaps it is worth investigating after all?

Yes, quite obviously it is (looking at the serial log).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel