Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.02.13 at 12:06, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 12.02.13 at 11:36, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:12 +0000, xen.org wrote:
>>> branch xen-unstable
>>> xen branch xen-unstable
>>> job test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu
>>> test guest-localmigrate/x10
>>> 
>>> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
>>> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
>>> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
>>> Tree: xen http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-unstable.hg 
>>> 
>>> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>>> 
>>>   Bug is in tree:  xen http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-unstable.hg 
>>>   Bug introduced:  fd997a96d448
>>>   Bug not present: ffd30e7388ad
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   changeset:   26523:fd997a96d448
>>>   tag:         tip
>>>   user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>>   date:        Fri Feb 08 11:06:04 2013 +0100
>>>       
>>>       x86: debugging code for testing 16Tb support on smaller memory systems
>>>       
>>>       Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>>       Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>> 
>> This is now the second bisection to finger this changeset
>> ("[xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2"
>> yesterday was the other).
>> 
>> Perhaps it is worth investigating after all?
> 
> Yes, quite obviously it is (looking at the serial log).

And this looks to be a domain page mapping leak, one of which I
already spotted on Friday (but didn't get around to send a patch
for, not the least because I wasn't in the office yesterday).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel