Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] arm: regarding live migration

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:13 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:46 +0900, Jaeyong Yoo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm interested in developing live migration in xen arm and possibly 
> > the contribution to the community and I hope this patch series could be a 
> > start.
> > 
> > For this matter, I have following questions:
> > 
> > (1) Is it OK to keep using the keyword "hvm"? Or, is it better to use pvh?
> 
> My personal preference is to avoid either of them, they are IMHO x86
> specific terms. On ARM we (currently) have only "domains", there aren't
> (yet) multiple types of domain

BTW, I appreciate that the term HVM at least is part of the common
hypercall API which we share with x86 -- we just have to live with that
I think.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel