[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] arm: regarding live migration
> > > For this matter, I have following questions: > > > > > > (1) Is it OK to keep using the keyword "hvm"? Or, is it better to use pvh? > > > > My personal preference is to avoid either of them, they are IMHO x86 > > specific terms. On ARM we (currently) have only "domains", there aren't > > (yet) multiple types of domain > > BTW, I appreciate that the term HVM at least is part of the common > hypercall API which we share with x86 -- we just have to live with that > I think. Got it. Jaeyong _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |