Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches...

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:34 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:36:02PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:23 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:25:19PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > > I've version 6 of my patches for 64bit PVH guest for xen.  This is 
> > > > Phase I.
> > > > These patches are built on top of git
> > > > c/s: 9204bc654562976c7cdebf21c6b5013f6e3057b3
> > > > 
> > > > V6:
> > > > The biggest change in V6 is dropping of dom0 PVH. It will take some time
> > > > to investigate and redo dom0 construct to use unmodified PV code. These 
> > > > patches in V6 will allow PV dom0 to create PVH domU. Please ack or 
> > > > indicate
> > > > individual patches if there are no issues, so I know they have been 
> > > > looked
> > > > at.
> > > 
> > > Ian, Tim, Ian, George,
> > > 
> > > Are you guys waiting for Jan to review all the patches or just
> > > the hypervisor ones before looking at the rest (say the libxl ones)?
> > 
> > There are libxl ones? I thought this was dom0 only at the moment?
> 
> The patchset had support for both - dom0 and domU. But Mukesh dropped
> the dom0 ones and is focusing on domU only. The changes are to libxc
> and libxl:

I thought the series (up to v5 at least) was dom0 *only*, I hadn't
realised this had been flipped onto its head for the v6 posting.

>  [PATCH 08/18] PVH xen: tools changes to create PVH domain

I'll try and find time to take a look, but it might have to wait until
after 4.3.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel