Re: [Xen-devel] Xen on ARM: Force register dump from guest.

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

At 16:41 +0100 on 07 Jun (1370623276), Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 16:48 +0200 on 07 Jun (1370623706), Sander Bogaert wrote:
> > On 6 June 2013 11:33, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > At 20:18 +0200 on 05 Jun (1370463493), Sander Bogaert wrote:
> > >> My application crashes whenever I use variadic arguments, the crashes
> > >> are totally random and sometimes non-existent, if this would raise any
> > >> red flags in your brain I'd be very happy to hear some suggestions too
> > >
> > > In the early stages of the Xen ARM port we had intermittent problems
> > > with varadics when the stack pointer got misaligned -- the toolchain's
> > > code for laying out stack arguments assumes that the stack pointer is
> > > properly (i.e. 8-byte, on 32-bit ARM!) aligned to start with, and can do
> > > some confusing things if not.
> > 
> > Thank you for the suggestion. I did however verify the stack is
> > properly aligned in the linkerscript.
> 
> It needs a bit more than that -- the stack pointer must be 8-byte aligned
> on all (visible) function calls.  In our case, although the stack area
> was properly aligned, there were some places (in asm code) where we
> called C functions with the stack only 4-byte aligned.
> 
> Anyway, if the application runs fine on linux without Xen

Looking back at the thread, I realise this makes no sense.  Sorry. :)

Tim.

> If it's really
> non-deterministic, even with the same call stacks, then maybe something
> is messed up with interrupt delivery.  It might be that Xen's
> return-from-interrupt code doesn't unwind non-aligned stacks properly.
> 
> Tim.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel